COMPETITIVENESS AS THE ABILITY TO ADAPT, NOT TO OUTPERFORM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32782/pdau.eco.2025.3.14Keywords:
competitiveness, adaptation, ambidexterity, dynamic capabilities, resource-based view (RBV), strategic management, emotional intelligence, risk management, innovation, turbulence, resilience, corporate governanceAbstract
The article explores the transformation of theoretical approaches to understanding organizational competitiveness amid growing instability and uncertainty in the external environment. The article substantiates a shift in understanding organizational competitiveness – from a focus on outperforming rivals to the ability to adapt strategically and efficiently in conditions of constant environmental turbulence. It argues that the traditional paradigm, which viewed competitiveness solely as the ability to outperform rivals, is gradually losing relevance. In its place, a new perspective is emerging in which competitiveness is interpreted as an organization’s ability to adapt while maintaining efficiency, innovativeness, and strategic integrity. Central to the study are the concepts of the Resource-Based View (RBV) and Dynamic Capabilities (DC), which together form the theoretical foundation for understanding new dimensions of strategic advantage. Particular attention is paid to the categories of adaptive performance, emotional intelligence of managers, and organizational ambidexterity – the ability of a firm to simultaneously sustain current operational efficiency while flexibly responding to emerging challenges. The study analyzes reports from leading international consulting firms such as McKinsey, Deloitte, and PwC, which highlight the growing role of adaptive strategies in corporate management practices. The research also emphasizes strategic risk management as a key factor in enhancing adaptive competitiveness: companies that integrate risk management into their overall strategy tend to demonstrate greater crisis resilience and a faster recovery of competitive positions. Based on an interdisciplinary approach, a generalized model of competitiveness formation is proposed, grounded in the principles of organizational ambidexterity and combining internal resource potential with dynamic managerial capabilities. This approach enables organizations to achieve simultaneous operational efficiency and strategic adaptability in a constantly turbulent environment. It is emphasized that the key to long-term competitiveness lies not only in possessing unique resources but in the ability to manage them effectively under persistent external volatility.
References
Eisenhardt K. M., Martin J. A. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal. 2000. №21(10–11), С.1105–1121. URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E (дата звернення: 18.03.2025).
Barney J. B. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management. 1991. № 17(1). С. 99–120.
Teece D. J., Pisano G., Shuen, A. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal. 1997. № 18(7). С. 509–533.
Voola R., Carlson J., West A. Emotional Intelligence and Competitive Advantage: Examining the Relationship from a Resource-Based View. Strategic Change. 2004. №13(2). С. 83–93.
McCann C., Roberts N., Sweeney A. Emotional Intelligence Predicts Academic Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin. 2020. № 146(2). С. 150–170.
McKinsey Company. The state of strategy: McKinsey Global Survey results. URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/mckinsey-global-surveys. (дата звернення: 18.03.2025).
PwC. Global CEO Survey 2021: Navigating the new reality. URL: https://www.strategyand.pwc.com/de/en/navigating-the-new-reality/ntnr/navigating-the-new-reality.pdf. (дата звернення: 18.03.2025).
Deloitte. 2020 Deloitte Global Human Capital Trends: The social enterprise at work. URL: https://mkto.deloitte.com/rs/712-CNF-326/images/tech-sap-global-human-capital-trends.pdf (дата звернення: 18.03.2025).
Tushman M.L., O’Reilly C.A. Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change. California Management Review. 1996. №38(4). С. 8–30.
Kaplan R. S., Mikes A. Managing Risks: A New Framework. Harvard Business Review. 2012. № 90(6). С. 48–60. URL: https://hbr.org/2012/06/managing-risks-a-new-framework (дата звернення: 18.03.2025).
Deloitte. The Future of Risk: Impacts of Risk-Driven Strategy on Organizational Resilience. URL: https://www2.deloitte.com/insights/us/en/topics/risk-management/risk-strategy-organizational-resilience.html (дата звернення: 18.03.2025).
Eisenhardt K. M., Martin J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<1105::AID-SMJ133>3.0.CO;2-E (accessed 18 March 2025).
Barney J.B. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, no. 17(1), pp. 99–120.
Teece D.J., Pisano G., Shuen A. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, no. 18(7), pp. 509–533.
Voola R., Carlson J., West A. (2004). Emotional Intelligence and Competitive Advantage: Examining the Relationship from a Resource-Based View. Strategic Change, no. 13(2), pp. 83–93.
McCann C., Roberts N., Sweeney A. (2020). Emotional Intelligence Predicts Academic Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, no. 146(2), pp. 150–170.
McKinsey Company. (2022). The state of strategy: McKinsey Global Survey results. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/mckinsey-global-surveys. (accessed 18 March 2025).
PwC. (2021). Global CEO Survey 2021: Navigating the new reality. Available at: https://www.strategyand.pwc.com/de/en/navigating-the-new-reality/ntnr/navigating-the-new-reality.pdf. (accessed 18 March 2025).
Deloitte. (2020). 2020 Deloitte Global Human Capital Trends: The social enterprise at work. Available at: https://mkto.deloitte.com/rs/712-CNF-326/images/tech-sap-global-human-capital-trends.pdf (accessed 18 March 2025).
Tushman M.L., O’Reilly C.A. (1996). Ambidextrous Organizations: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change. California Management Review, no. 38(4), pp. 8–30.
Kaplan R. S., Mikes A. (2012). Managing Risks: A New Framework. Harvard Business Review, no. 90(6), pp. 48–60. Available at: https://hbr.org/2012/06/managing-risks-a-new-framework (accessed 18 March 2025).
Deloitte. (2023). The Future of Risk: Impacts of Risk-Driven Strategy on Organizational Resilience. Available at: https://www2.deloitte.com/insights/us/en/topics/risk-management/risk-strategy-organizational-resilience.html (accessed 18 March 2025).